the health care opinion on its website, accessible to the public, we would not have had reports over cnn and fox news that incorrectly characterized what the holdings were in the case. people in the main offices were not able to read the decision the same way people in the press office were reading it. it is always nice when news organizations want to cover the courts. i've always appreciated when local news organizations go to washington. sometimes, the man reporters go to the sticks to report on the case. they write articles about it in the washington post or the new york times. have been more press coverage, all the better. also, making the decisions readily available to the public service an important role. hopefully, next time, the court will be prepared to of web servers that work. >> all of the listeners know to go to these three gentlemen for their expert opinion. clark? sorry if i am wrong with discriminating against questions. >> i want to go pick up on a theme that david started. if you look at the confirmation hearings for judge roberts, what you see is the dominant theme was